Last Wednesday, following the Polish Day of Independence, our team gathered to read and discuss Spectral Borders: History, Neighbourliness and Discord on the Polish-Belarusian Frontier by Aimée Joyce (Sean Kingston Publishing, 2024). The session resulted in a heated exchange around the book’s main arguments and methods.

The discussion began with a short round of first impressions on the content of the book, followed by an open conversation about its key themes. We reflected on how the author’s approach relates to our research and considered how the book’s ideas might inform our project. Particular attention was given to the way the text handles questions of specters, visions of borderlands, and ethical challenges of anonymization and presentation of the fieldwork. Our debate was influenced by the fact that two of our team members (Karolina and Karina) conducted a fieldwork in the eastern Polish borderlands as well. We discussed how our positionality and our relationship with the region affected our reading of the book. 

The conversation concluded with reflections on how this book contributes to ongoing questions about hauntology as a metaphor, method, and theoretical framework. Overall, the meeting provided space for thinking collaboratively about how scholarship continues to evolve through shared reading and discussion.

At the end of October, our team had the pleasure of hosting Dr. David Duindam from the University of Amsterdam for a fascinating seminar titled “The Ruins of Radio Malabar: Infrastructure as Colonial Heritage in Indonesia”. The presentation drew from the ongoing research project “Concrete Colonialism: Architecture and Heritage in Indonesia around Independence” which David conducts together with Dr. Rixt Woudstra and Anita Halim Lim, M.A.

David presented his findings and thoughts on the circulation, use, and afterlives of concrete in the former Dutch East Indies and postcolonial Indonesia. His project explores how this seemingly modern, durable material became entangled with histories of colonial governance, technological ambition, and nation-building. Focusing on two early radio stations, one in Kootwijk (the Netherlands) and one in Malabar (Indonesia), he traces how concrete connects infrastructures, landscapes, and political imaginaries across continents. The presentation highlighted how radio technology, landscape engineering, and colonial aesthetics intersected, turning “infrastructure” into both a material and symbolic bridge between Europe and Southeast Asia.

In an engaging discussion, team members reflected on themes of migratory heritage, the durability and decay of concrete, and the ways colonial legacies persist in postcolonial space. Questions of ethnographic method, environmental impact, and the emotional meanings of material heritage enriched the exchange.

We thank David for sharing his thought-provoking research and for inspiring our team to think critically about how materials themselves, such as concrete, carry histories of empire, memory, and transformation.

In her latest blog post, Magdalena Bubík takes inspiration from the exhibition “Liberec versus Jablonec” at the Severočeské Muzeum [the North Bohemian Museum] in Liberec. Moved by an old map covered with countless stickers, she explores the complex layers of memory, belonging, and identity tied to a place that has undergone a near-complete population change. What does it mean to feel “at home” when the past and present seem to speak different languages?

Blog post you can find here.

This time without Michal, the female part of our team decided to discuss the current Czech knowledge production about formerly German sites and cemeteries published this year in international journals. We gathered online to discuss the article titled: “Institutionalised amnesia? Exploring geographies of memory and the care of German graves in Central Europe: insights from the Czech Republic” written by Lukáš Novotný, a scholar based at University of Jan E. Purkyně in Ústí nad Labem and another article “Reanimation of abandoned places: three case studies from Czechia” by a collective of Czech authors. Novotný focuses on preserving the formerly German cemeteries in the Czech Republic and conducted interviews with mayors and professionals. His data illustrate very well that caring for cemeteries is not only a matter of international politics and ideology, but also everyday management that is difficult for small Czech municipalities. The Study of Kreisslová and a collective of authors is a comparative study of three cases of abandoned and destroyed formerly German villages in Czechia and bottom-up efforts to reconstruct or memorialize them. They focus on these alternative heritage preservation practices and hypothesize how they can inspire thinking about abandoned places in other regions. 

Both pieces inspired our writing about the region, and as both articles were published as open access, we encourage you to read them as well.

We invite you to explore the topic further and read about Karina’s recent field research, in which she describes how a group of volunteers cares for the damaged cemetery of the former German inhabitants of the village Čermná (German: Leukersdorf) near Ústí nad Labem (German: Aussig).