We are pleased to announce that Michal Korhel is one of the guest editors of a special issue of Český lid. We encourage researchers to submit their articles for consideration.

More information below.

Deadline for abstracts: 15 November 2026

Český lid, 1/2028 – Special Issue

WALKING MATTERS: Kinaesthetic Modes of Memory, Belonging and Research

Guest editors: Michal Korhel (Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw), Jana Nosková (Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno), Sabine Stach (Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe, Leipzig)

Walking, hiking, pilgrimage, biking or even running – moving of one’s own accord – are essential for exploring historic sites, experiencing landscapes, researching cultures and commemorating past events and people. Walking is not just a way of getting from A to B; it can also be used deliberately to stimulate thoughts, memories or relationships, and to foster a sense of identity. For more than ten years, hundreds of people have each year walked the 32-kilometre “March of Reconciliation” (“Pouť smíření”) route from Pohořelice to Brno. In May 1945, some 20,000 German-speaking residents of Brno were driven out along this same route towards Austria. In Warsaw, more than 12,000 people took part in this year’s 35th commemorative run for the “heroes” of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising (“Bieg Powstania Warszawskiego”). In addition, there are numerous other commemorative activities that are based on physical, and in some cases athletic, practices. For instance, people hike through their families’ regions of origin, traverse former borders, retrace historical routes, undertake pilgrimages to historic sites or explore landscapes through tourism and everyday movement.

For researchers in the fields of Memory Studies, Heritage Studies or Public History, such kinaesthetic modes of engaging with the past require a broader methodological toolkit: they must become physically active themselves. Consequently, researchers are increasingly drawing on methods that anthropologists have been using and discussing for many years. Approaches such as walking ethnography, participant observation, mobile interviews and sensory ethnography are based on the idea that knowledge is inextricably linked to the physical and spatial context in which it is created. When walking alongside their interviewees, researchers perceive the landscape differently from how they would in a stationary interview. Conversations, memories and narratives can also be transformed by movement and encounters with specific places. This raises the question of the positionality of the ‘walking’ researcher; terrain, weather, physical exertion, speed, breaks and shared spatial orientation all influence the research situation. Therefore, walking ethnography is not merely a mobile variant of the qualitative interview, but rather a research approach that actively incorporates the body, movement and the environment into the production of knowledge.

This special issue explores the relationship between movement, perception and knowledge. Taking walking as a case study (while also considering other forms of non-motorised movement), it examines the interplay between memory, belonging and research. It considers the various contexts and forms of mobile experience, ranging from everyday walks and hikes to tourist activities, border crossings, journeys through ancestral landscapes, pilgrimages, processions, memorial marches, memory walks and historical re-enactments. Particular attention is given to the interplay between physicality, landscape, materiality, movement, repetition, collective participation, emotion and a sense of belonging. How can the increasing use of the body as a medium of memory be explained and explored? What relationship exists between historical tradition, individual memory, political activism and the search for unique experiences? It also asks: How does the perception of a place change when it is traversed rather than merely observed? In what ways are memories activated through movement and tied to the landscape? What role do distance, speed, rhythm, exhaustion, the weather or the terrain play? In terms of explicit remembrance practices, the tension between the significance attributed to such events and how participants actually experience them is also worth noting, as well as is the overlap between leisure, sport, commemoration and historical education that characterises many of these formats.

Český lid / Czech Ethnological Journal is the leading, peer-reviewed Czech ethnological journal, published in print and in diamond open access by the Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague; it is regularly indexed and abstracted in Scopus (Q2). The aim of this special issue, co-edited by Michal Korhel, Jana Nosková and Sabine Stach, is to encourage dialogue among scholars working in ethnology and anthropology, history, human geography, memory and heritage studies, mobility studies and tourism research. The focus is on contemporary examples (generally dating from around 1989 onwards), though historical genealogies may be included where they are relevant to understanding current practices. We particularly welcome contributions that present innovative methodological approaches through concrete case studies, while also exploring the analytical value of a kinaesthetic perspective for understanding space, memory and belonging.

Possible topics include, among others:

• Walking and remembering: commemorative marches, memory walks, pilgrimages, processions, historical re-enactments, commemorative marathons and runs, and other forms of physically practised remembrance;
• Walking and belonging: heritage tourism, genealogical journeys, return journeys to regions of origin and movement through familial and biographical landscapes;
• Walking and borders: border hikes and bike tours, routes along former and current borders, such as the Iron Curtain Trail, cross-border routes and the physical experience of political spaces;
• Walking and landscape: the perception and appropriation of historical, post-industrial, post-Soviet or post-socialist landscapes through movement;
• Walking and heritage: themed walks, heritage trails, tourist routes and the production of historical landscapes;
• Walking and mobility: the relationship between walking and other forms of physical movement such as running or cycling; questions of speed, rhythm and physical exertion; the experiences of people with physical disabilities, including questions of inclusion and accessibility;
• Walking as method: walking interviews, walking ethnography, mobile and sensory methods, and issues of positionality, reflexivity and knowledge production.

Of particular interest are contributions that connect these areas and view walking as a situated and embodied practice of perception and knowledge production.

Abstracts (max. 500 words, in English) should outline the research question(s) as well as the theoretical and methodological approach adopted and can be submitted to sabine.stach@leibniz-gwzo.de and noskova@eu.cas.cz.

Contributors should also include a short, 100-word biographical note (in English).

Deadline for abstracts: 15 November 2026

Notification of acceptance: 15 December 2026

Full chapter submission: 15 June 2027

For further information, please contact Sabine Stach sabine.stach@leibniz-gwzo.de.

On August 21st, Karina Hoření was invited to speak at the discussion “Kdo se bojí Sudet?” (“Who is afraid of Sudetenland?”). The debate was a public event of the annual Summer School for Teachers, organized by the Faculty of Arts, Charles University, and the DOX gallery, where it was held. 

Together with Olga Nešporová from the Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Matěj Spurný from the Institute of History, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, they shared experience from their research and public work in the region. The debate focused on the recent controversy around the assembly of the Sudetenland Expelees Organization and the March of Reconciliation in Brno this May. During the debate, Karina shared her experience from the march and her interpretation, which she summed up in her latest blog post.

This year’s Sudeten German Days for the first time took place in Brno, Czechia. This provoked a backlash from Czech nationalists. You can read about it in either Karina Hoření’s or Michal Korhel’s texts published soon after these events. It also became the starting point for a conversation about the history of Czech-German relations in the recent two-part episode in the Czechostacja podcast, where the quest was Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska. Karolina, together with the podcast’s host, Jakub Medek, discuss difficult legacy of Czech-German relations after the Second World War. They explore the German violence toward Czechs during the war and occupation, and then the so-called “wild expulsions” of Germans from Czechoslovakia in 1945, a period marked by death marches and local massacres. How is this remembered in contemporary Czechia? And is there a way out of such an entangled history of violence?

We invite you to listen to both episodes available here and here.

From 21 to 24 July 2026, members of our project team took part in the biennial conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA), held in Poznań under the theme “Anthropology: Possibilities in a Polarised World”. The event brought together anthropologists from across Europe and beyond to discuss current challenges, methodological innovations, and new directions in anthropological research.

Researchers from the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences were strongly represented at the conference, presenting their work and co-organising panels and workshops. Our project team actively contributed to these activities.

Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska co-organised the panel “Entangled Ruins: Polarised Temporalities and the Afterlives of Decay” together with Václav Sixta (Charles University, Prague). The panel explored different ways in which ruins can be powerful actors of the polarised temporalities of our age, as they embody collisions between past and future, decay and renewal, endurance and disappearance. Thanks to the collaboration with colleagues from Charles University, Karolína Pauknerová and Eliška Fulinová, who served as discussants, the panel sparked inspiring discussions, creating new opportunities for future collaboration. We are happy that it was again an occasion to meet our colleagues from the project “The Land Gone Wild. Archaeological and Transdisciplinary Research on Resilience Strategies in the 20th Century”, affiliated with several Czech institutions and interested in tracing German traces.

Karina Hoření presented the paper “Ethnography to Make It to the Pre-School – New Vocabulary for Ethnographic Practice” as part of the panel on Patchwork Ethnography. Her presentation reflected on methodological adaptations in contemporary ethnographic research and contributed to ongoing conversations about flexible and sustainable fieldwork practices. She used her experience in Spectral Recycling, conducting fieldwork in Liberec.

Magdalena Bubík presented the paper “Can a Ghost Hinder Urban Development? The Site of the Former Town Church and Victory Square in Piła” in a panel dedicated to the agency of religious buildings. Her presentation examined how the memory of a demolished church continues to influence urban space and local perceptions, demonstrating the lasting social significance of places that have physically disappeared in post-displacement regions.

Participating in EASA 2026 provided an excellent opportunity to share our research with the international anthropological community, receive valuable feedback, strengthen existing collaborations, and establish new academic connections that will contribute to the further development of the project.