Przejdź do treści

Angelika Zanki

Sudety nebo Krkonošsko-jesenická subprovincie

Proč (někteří) Češi nemají rádi Sudety 

[ENG, Czech version below] Based on two examples from the contemporary public debate, Karina Hoření describes why some Czechs avoid the term “Sudety” and why this term carries negative connotations in Czech language. The first example refers to a lookout tower on the Czech-Polish border in the Orlické Mountains and differences between Polish and Czech conceptualizations of the term. The aforementioned tower stood on the top of Vrchmezí / Orlica as early as in the 19th century, when this area was a part of Prussia. Currently, the lookout was restored and in the vicinity of a new tower, an information board with bilingual sign was put. While in Polish, it informs that the original lookout tower stood in the “Sudety”, the Czech translation uses more scientific term “Krkonošsko-jesenická subprovincie”. Then, Karin exemplifies a range of emotions the term “Sudety” carries in Czech language. The second example comes from a Facebook discussion on the page of a liquor store that sells apple schnapps under the name of “Sudeten Schnaps”. Many of the discussants find this name inappropriate: for them the “Sudety” are clearly associated with Nazism. For many people, the history of 1938, when the First Czechoslovak Republic was divided by the Third Reich, still overlays any other meanings of the word “Sudety” and is highly emotionally charged. Within the project we propose to look beyond the common identification of “Sudety” with a particular point in Czech history, i.e. Munich agreement, and to look at the particular cultures that emerged there post-1945.

Statement regarding the International conference “Divided, Yet Together: Borders in Oral History Perspective” in Bratislava

At the beginning of February our researchers, Karina Hoření and Michal Korhel, participated in the 8th International Conference “Divided, Yet Together: Borders in Oral History Perspective” in Bratislava organised by Czech Oral History Asocciation. They gave the presentation “Rozhovory s novousadlíkmi ako spôsob hľadania nemeckých „duchov“ v povojnovom Československu a Poľsku”.


IMPORTANT STATEMENT

As a research team, we find disturbing the circumstances, in which the conference took place. Therefore, we issued a separate statement, which reads as follows.

The main organizer of the conference was the Czech Oral History Association (COHA). The atmosphere of the event has been influenced by the ongoing investigation of the two former directors of the association, Miroslav Vaněk and Pavel Mücke, who are accused of numerous cases of sexual abuse and long-standing misuse of power at the institutions they led. 

The serious allegations, which are outlined in the statements by the Faculty of Humanities of Charles University  and were addressed in the Czech press as well, point to a long term inappropriate behavior of both university lecturers and structural problems of Czech academia.

These issues were raised by our team at the conference. We appreciate that, despite the initial hesitation, the situation was debated during the event and that consequently it resulted in the decision of COHA to amend its code of ethics. Hopefully, it will clear the path for how the association proceeds in such cases from now on.

The question of ethical standards of research is particularly important in such a vulnerable field as oral history. There is no solid line dividing us as scholars from us as humans. Therefore, in academia as well as outside of academic context, it is unacceptable to work with people who violate all these standards by their everyday behavior. 

We hope that the case will be investigated properly and the appropriate consequences will be drawn. It is to be hoped that it will mark the beginning of change in Czech and Slovak academic institutions.

You can support Call for Action to End Gender Based Violence in Academia with your signature here

or you can support legislative change of definition of rape in Czech legal system here.

Workshop with Anna Kurpiel (Centrum Studiów Niemieckich i Europejskich im. W. Brandta, Uniwersytet Wrocławski) and Katarzyna Maniak (Uniwersytet Jagielloński)

On December 7, 2022, we had the pleasure of hosting a workshop with Anna Kurpiel (Centrum Studiów Niemieckich i Europejskich im. W. Brandta, Uniwersytet Wrocławski) and Katarzyna Maniak (Uniwersytet Jagielloński) who shared with us the results of their project “The reality of things in the post-conflict space. The role of objects in the creation of Wrocław and Szczecin imagined worlds”, financed by the National Science Centre.
We were discussing how currently the descendants of the settlers approach formerly German objects and to what extent the class they belong to affects their views on the subject. We were particularly interested in methodological topics and comparing our experiences with fieldwork.

Sprawdź innych autorów
  • Angelika Zanki
  • reddog